Re: Why Jami?

[Sruli Saurymper]

> Another thing is that it at least earlier did not seem possible to start
> up jami and use it without creating a jami address, and just do SIP.  It
> seems obvious that this should be possible if it "supports SIP".  I
> realize there is no great cost to creating an account, but someone might
> not want it to be registered (either DHT or proxy) and there is
> cognitive load in doing unwanted things.
As far as I remember you can now add a SIP account without the need to
register for a jami account. (I have not used it for SIP though)

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature