[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Koha-devel] KohaWiki defaced daily
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Koha-devel] KohaWiki defaced daily |
Date: |
Thu Nov 4 04:46:09 2004 |
On 2004-11-04 08:04:52 +0000 Roger BUCK <address@hidden> wrote:
The tavi wiki software has not kept pace with these developments and
has seen
little development in general over the last two years.
How much development does a wiki need? They should be fairly simple
tools that do a fairly simple task well. I recently ranted about
creeping featurism in Kwiki on
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2004-8.html#kwiki1101
The wiki is backed up nightly (sqldump - around 16:00 GMT) and there
are
monthly backups (held for at least six months), but there is no
simple way to
restore a previous version of a defaced page via the in-built
revision
control system.
That's a shame. Is there a complicated way and is it possible to
automate it? Even just a "this page has been spammed" link to tell
someone who can roll it back would help.
One wiki I use has a single username and password (htaccess) which
seems to stop nearly all spammers, despite the login prompt (AuthName)
saying what the username and password are!
Taking all of the above (and related issues such as RSS problems)
into
consideration, it may be time to look for an alternative solution?
Possibly. Recently, I have used:
* MoinMoin - never liked this one or used it much
* Twiki - only as a user - seems very complicated with multiple webs
and user registration - supplied templates are buggy
* Kwiki - 0.18 is fast, easy to install and flexible, but the current
0.33 has several obscure dependencies and doesn't seem as simple to
modify - supplied templates are buggy in both versions - revision
control extensions available
* UseMod - fairly easy to install, but is one huge perl script so
probably not easy to modify. Revision control included.
* PhpWiki - stable version is fairly easy to install and use - similar
to Tavi, I think. Newer version has lots of plugins and extensions.
WikiMarkup is quite different to the normal one, I think.
I may have confused some of those. You are in a maze of twisty
WikiCode, all different.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Unsolicited attachments to the pipex address deleted
Will HLF fund tree-killings? http://www.thewalks.co.uk/