l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: L4Mach or Refactor Hurd Servers?

From: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Subject: Re: L4Mach or Refactor Hurd Servers?
Date: 11 Nov 2001 15:13:14 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 
Farid Hajji <address@hidden> writes:

> Absolutely. No-senders/dead port notification is one of the hardest parts
> to port to a non-mach kernel, like L4.

Please don't talk about these as if they were the same thing.  Dead
name notifications are not very important.  No senders notifications
*are* important, and the use we make of them is critical in any
Hurd-like system.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]