[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?
From: |
Roland McGrath |
Subject: |
Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:13:04 -0500 (EST) |
> address@hidden (Niels Möller) writes:
>
> > I believe this class of "simple" rpc:s is what matters for
> > performance.
>
> I'm not so sure of that. One critical cases are dir_lookup (which
> makes transfers of ports both ways). But it's hard to say for sure
> without some instrumentation.
It's clear that the overhead of io_read and io_write is more critical
than that of dir_lookup, which always entails some overhead for
transferring ports. I think that's the point Niels was making.
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, (continued)
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/21
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Espen Skoglund, 2001/12/21
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/21
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/23
- Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Espen Skoglund, 2001/12/24
- Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/25
- Re: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Espen Skoglund, 2001/12/26
- Re: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Ondrej Hurt, 2001/12/27
- Re: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Adam Olsen, 2001/12/27
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/20
- Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?,
Roland McGrath <=
- RE: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Volkmar Uhlig, 2001/12/23
- RE: Re: Re: emulating no-senders notifications in L4?, Volkmar Uhlig, 2001/12/27