[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd IPC
From: |
Neal H. Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd IPC |
Date: |
15 Oct 2002 10:45:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 |
> There's actually one point that's still not very clear to me about the IPC
> model you described. You said the client would *only* keep the handle. Now, if
> the client does an open on two different servers and both of them return the
> same handle (the same integer), how can the client differentiate between them
> in further communication?
On L4, a handle will be unique to a server which means that the client
must store both the server's communication thread id and the handle
id. On Mach, a handle would be task local--it is just a normal port
managed by Mach.
- Re: VMM, (continued)
- Re: VMM, Niels Möller, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Espen Skoglund, 2002/10/15
- Re: VMM, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/15
- Hurd IPC, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/11
- Re: Hurd IPC, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/10/13
- Re: Hurd IPC, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/10/13
- Re: Hurd IPC, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/13
- Re: Hurd IPC, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/10/14
- Re: Hurd IPC, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/15
- Re: Hurd IPC, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/10/15
- Re: Hurd IPC,
Neal H. Walfield <=
- Re: Hurd IPC, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/10/15
- Re: Hurd IPC, Niels Möller, 2002/10/15
- Re: Hurd IPC, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/10/15
- Re: Hurd IPC, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/15
- Re: Hurd IPC (client side), Ludovic Courtès, 2002/10/21
- Re: Hurd IPC (client side), Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/29
- Re: Licensing Issues, Neal H. Walfield, 2002/10/11