[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No luck with libc compilation - missing l4/arch.h file (?)
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: No luck with libc compilation - missing l4/arch.h file (?) |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:26:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:55:44 +0100,
Bas Wijnen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Sure. If you really want to get us ahead of where we have already
> > been a zillion times though, it would be nice if you could work out
> > how to get proper "make install-header" targets with automake, so that
> > we can have a clean and proper bootstrap procedure without dirty tricks.
> > It can't be much that is required to get this working properly.
>
> Sounds good, but I don't know much about autotools. Perhaps this is a
> good time to learn about them. :-)
Yes, indeed :)
> >>Also, there should be a
> >>note about linking the include and library files.
> >
> > I hope I have made sufficiently clear why there should not be such a note.
>
> Well, at the moment the absense of a note suggests that everything
> works.
You mean, like with the absence of source code? :) Mmh, there is
something true with that. Code that doesn't exist can't be broken...
Thanks,
Marcus
- Re: No luck with libc compilation - missing l4/arch.h file (?),
Marcus Brinkmann <=