l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A comment about changing kernels


From: Bernhard Kauer
Subject: Re: A comment about changing kernels
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 00:42:30 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:25:43AM -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 11:39 +0100, Bernhard Kauer wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps I should give an example to make my statement clear:
> > Suppose a client A want to transfer a capability to a session to client B.
> > Client A can copy or map this capability to B and let B invoke the capbility
> > to get a new session from the server S. Or A can call S and say: "give this
> > capability to B". Both cases need independently of copy/map 4 IPC's.
> 
> You are using your assumptions to reason in a circle. If your protocol
> did not presume that sessions were desirable, and that an update to the
> badge is therefore necessary, you would conclude that a single COPY from
> A to B is sufficient.

Yes, it simply states that session-based protocols are independet of copy/map.
They need only one of these operations.


    Bernhard




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]