[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sysadmins
From: |
Justin Emmanuel |
Subject: |
Sysadmins |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:51:48 +0000 |
Also in the desktop Enterprise the systems admin needs to be very
intrusive. To do things like create default interfaces, and make users
adhere to company policy;
How about super users with different rights and authorities?
Why not split the concentration of power?
On 02/11/05, Leonardo Lopes Pereira <address@hidden> wrote:
> After a quick discuss with marco_g on IRC, i started to thing about Why we
> need a sysadmin. And I realize that only small options on the system need the
> admin interference. I saw that many people here are very fanatic about
> security, but what about a system with a admin that put backdoors on programs?
>
> So, if we will design a system where people can fell secure, we need to
> create a system where the admin has less power as possible.
>
> In my opinion, the admin is a user that will be able ONLY to configure some
> parts of the system that cannot be configured by a user. All other things
> that the admin needs to do, like run a server, will be done by a common user
> with no more power than other users.
>
> To install programs we can create a mechanism that every user can install
> programs that will be avaliable to every users. but all programs would be
> signed on their origin, and if the user trust on that origin, this program
> will be able to work perfectly, if the user doesn't trust on the origin of
> the program it will be alerted about that and will choose how this program
> will run. With no access to FS, with a read-only access to FS or if the user
> will start to trust on that origin.
>
> I know that this is only one case of many thing that a sysadmin does, but
> this was what wake up this discuss in my mind, so, if you have more things
> that you beleave that only sysadmin can does, we can start to discuss, thanks.
>
> ps.: I do not want to start a monster thread, But I beleave if you want a
> system almost from scratch, we need to discuss every point of it.
>
> --
> leonardolopespereira at gmail.com
>
> GNU Privacy Guard (GPG)
> ID da chave: 83E8AFBF | servidor: keys.indymedia.org
> gpg --keyserver keys.indymedia.org --recv-keys 83E8AFBF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> L4-hurd mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
>
>
>
>
- Re: DRM, (continued)
- Re: DRM, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/06
- Re: DRM, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/06
- Re: DRM, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/06
- Re: DRM, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/06
- TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/07
- Re: TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/11/07
- Re: TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/07
- Re: TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04
Meaning of filesystems (was: Re: Sysadmins), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/03
Message not available
- Sysadmins,
Justin Emmanuel <=
- Re: Sysadmins, Brian Brunswick, 2005/11/03
Re: Sysadmins, Emmanuel Colbus, 2005/11/03
Re: Sysadmins, Emmanuel Colbus, 2005/11/03
Re: Sysadmins, Emmanuel Colbus, 2005/11/05
RE: Sysadmins, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/05
Re: Sysadmins, Emmanuel Colbus, 2005/11/06