[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Christopher Nelson |
Subject: |
RE: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:09:59 -0700 |
>
> On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 19:20 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
> > Even if the compare operation is bound (ie there is a limit on the
> > length of the filename) I do not see how the EROS solution
> guaratees
> > any latency constraint. Searching a directory with 4G
> files can take
> > quite long.
>
> Not if you choose appropriate data structures for storage.
For example, a balanced binary tree can reduce this to about 32
operations, max.
-={C}=-
- Re: On PATH_MAX, (continued)
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX,
Christopher Nelson <=
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/08
RE: On PATH_MAX, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/09