[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: awareness + flexibility + security
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: awareness + flexibility + security |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:25:51 -0500 |
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 02:05 -0800, Jun Inoue wrote:
> Having the
> right to refuse to respond does little good, because users are forced
> to enable attestation to get service. Even worse, many will likely
> adopt that as a habit.
Actually, I think that the use of attestation for any but the most
delicate applications is extremely unlikely, mainly because tracking the
configuration data is so hard.
shap
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, (continued)
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/14
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/14
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/15
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/15
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/15
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Jun Inoue, 2005/11/14
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/12
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/13
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/15
- Re: awareness + flexibility + security, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/15