[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why L4 should be aborted?
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Why L4 should be aborted? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:37:49 -0500 |
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 11:48 -0200, Matheus Morais wrote:
> I can't understand why the next generation of L4Ka Pistachio wouldn't
> give support to run Hurd on top of it? Someone can explain it to me
> please?
Matheus:
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure how to understand your question. Are you
asking:
Why isn't L4Ka Pistachio already good enough for Hurd-NG?
or
Why aren't the L4Ka architects willing to make changes to support
the Hurd?
I *think* you are asking the first question. Can you confirm?
Thanks
shap