l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reliability of RPC services

From: Marcus Brinkmann
Subject: Re: Reliability of RPC services
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 02:09:55 +0200
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) 
At Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:42:41 +0200,
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> In the upcoming L4 versions, and in Coyotos, destruction of the
> receiver of a reply capability does not cause any action to be
> triggered: Pending RPCs are not aborted.  This is because there is an
> extra level of indirection between the reply capability and the thread
> (first class receive buffer).

Clarification: FCRB here is meant as a synonymous for thread (one is
an L4 term, the other a Coyotos term).  The indirection is of course
the endpoint.

Thanks,
Marcus
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]