[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reliability of RPC services
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Reliability of RPC services |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 06:53:26 -0400 |
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 12:08 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> So, what Jonathan says is only true at the abstract level for Coyotos:
> The way reply capabilities are implemented using the payload match
> they can be used several times, until the client changes the payload.
> In fact, they can be reused at a later time if the client would change
> back the payload again.
In Coyotos, the difference (in practice) between a send capability and a
receive capability is that the payload in the corresponding FCRB is
automatically incremented as a consequence of invocation.
shap
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, (continued)
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Michal Suchanek, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/24
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/24
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Michal Suchanek, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/24
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/23
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/22
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/23