[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reliability of RPC services
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Reliability of RPC services |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:25:31 -0400 |
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:56 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> If user interaction is not admitted to the problem, then I agree that
> it seems that upper bounds on wall clock time are indispensable.
> However, I would not rush to this solution...
I agree completely. Where the user can directly solve the problem this
is better than a watchdog. The watchdog is appropriate where (a) no user
is available or (b) we may want to point out to the user that a problem
exists.
shap
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, (continued)
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2006/04/26