[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reliability of RPC services
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Reliability of RPC services |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:44:54 -0400 |
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 10:00 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> Obviously user-provided drivers cannot be allowed to do that directly (but
> they may do it through calls to the framework). However, for user-provided
> drivers I was thinking about devices that the users brings with him. There it
> would be the bus driver (usb, firewire) which does the DMA calls, and the
> actual driver just talks to the bus driver.
This isn't how things work. The DMA chip isn't generally associated with
the bus. It's generally on the card. USB may be something that could be
handled as a special case.
shap
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, (continued)
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Bas Wijnen, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Michal Suchanek, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/25
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/26
- Re: Reliability of RPC services, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/26
- Cancellation forwarding protocol (was Re: Reliability of RPC services), Pierre THIERRY, 2006/04/27
- Re: Cancellation forwarding protocol (was Re: Reliability of RPC services), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/04/27