Backups vs. privacy (was Re: Directories traversal (was [...]))

l4-hurd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Backups vs. privacy (was Re: Directories traversal (was [...]))

From:	Pierre THIERRY
Subject:	Backups vs. privacy (was Re: Directories traversal (was [...]))
Date:	Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:52:47 +0200
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403

Scribit Bas Wijnen dies 28/04/2006 hora 14:01:
> form which can be used for recovering, because we have a persistent
> system.  Making a backup should simply consist of copying the
> snapshot.

If data is not dynamically encrypted on-disk, copying the snapshot gives
him the ability to read your files, doesn't it?

Surprisingly,
Nowhere man
-- 
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Directories traversal (was Re: the deadly hypercube of death, or: handling permissions), (continued)
- RE: the deadly hypercube of death, or: handling permissions, Christopher Nelson, 2006/04/27

Prev by Date: Design principles and ethics (was Re: Execute without read (was [...]))
Next by Date: Re: Design principles and ethics (was Re: Execute without read (was [...]))
Previous by thread: Re: Directories traversal (was Re: the deadly hypercube of death, or: handling permissions)
Next by thread: Re: Backups vs. privacy (was Re: Directories traversal (was [...]))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread