[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No need for CC, please
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
Subject: |
Re: No need for CC, please |
Date: |
Wed, 3 May 2006 20:45:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Scribit Thomas Schwinge dies 03/05/2006 hora 04:16:
> And what about my other argument? (The including non list members
> into discussions one.)
It is indeed a good argument. But I ain't sure it is a good reason to
always answer to list and author...
> Hm. You could drop mail that has address@hidden in the To: or Cc:
> header, but doesn't have a List-Id: header. That's the only way I can
> imagine right now (at least without constructing a more convoluted
> scenario);
Which adds some configuration burden. I suspect there will be some false
positive, also (like when the sender really meant me to receive a
private copy, for purpose).
Doubtfully,
Nowhere man
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: No need for CC, please, (continued)
- Re: No need for CC, please, Jeroen Dekkers, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
- Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/03
- Re: No need for CC, please,
Pierre THIERRY <=
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, Thomas Schwinge, 2006/05/09
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/11
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/13
- Re: No need for CC, please, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/05/02
Re: No need for CC, please, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/02