[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement |
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2006 13:09:22 -0400 |
On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 15:23 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 03:11:56PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Anyway, I think you are attacking the issue from the wrong angle. The
> > DRM distributors are concerned about the encapsulation of their code.
> > We are concerned about confinement.
I think that this is incorrect. The DRM distributors are concerned about
the content that the code protects. The code itself could be disclosed
with no added risk to the content.
shap
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, (continued)
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/05/04
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Michal Suchanek, 2006/05/19
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/19
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Michal Suchanek, 2006/05/19
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/19
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Michal Suchanek, 2006/05/19
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/19
- Re: Clarification (was: Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=