[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Restricted storage
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
RE: Restricted storage |
Date: |
Wed, 31 May 2006 18:28:06 -0400 |
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 15:33 -0600, Christopher Nelson wrote:
> [Bas wrote]
> > ...because there is no no way that it can check if the storage
> > it received is indeed opaque.
>
> What's the point of providing opaque storage to store encryption keys,
> if you cannot verify (or provide some guarantee) that it is, in fact
> opaque? You might as well not have it, because it provides you no
> conceptual security. It's not trustable.
This is entirely correct.
- Restricted storage, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/29
- Re: Restricted storage, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/29
- Re: Restricted storage, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/05/29
- Re: Restricted storage, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/29
- RE: Restricted storage, Christopher Nelson, 2006/05/31
- RE: Restricted storage,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Restricted storage, Bas Wijnen, 2006/05/31
- Re: Restricted storage, Eric Northup, 2006/05/31
- Re: Restricted storage, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/05/31
- Re: Restricted storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/31
Re: Restricted storage, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/05/29
Re: Restricted storage, Pierre THIERRY, 2006/05/29