[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Challenge: Confinement
|
From: |
Tom Bachmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Challenge: Confinement |
|
Date: |
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:42:10 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060403) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Better move this topic to some Coyotos-specific forum, so we can avoid
> having all the DRM/TC discussions here all over again...
For DRM/TC, I fully agree, but they design (aiui) multiserver secure
architectures, which is (except the aforementioned) on our line, too (aiui).
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE4iOSvD/ijq9JWhsRAm1TAJ9LhN3ZyB0EMjDTqGx5RYwlDKISgwCePVOX
qdPxnCcgFXs5IZtYPb71V4k=
=rPPE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Separate trusted computing designs, (continued)
- Re: Separate trusted computing designs, Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/08/31
- Re: Separate trusted computing designs, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/08/31
- Retracting the term ownership (was: Re: Separate trusted computing designs), Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/08/31
- Re: Retracting the term ownership (was: Re: Separate trusted computing designs), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/08/31
- Re: Retracting the term ownership (was: Re: Separate trusted computing designs), Marcus Brinkmann, 2006/08/31
Re: Challenge: Confinement, olafBuddenhagen, 2006/08/15
- Re: Challenge: Confinement,
Tom Bachmann <=
Message not available
Challenge: Confinement, Christian Stüble, 2006/08/16