Re: Alternative network stack design

[Tom Bachmann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marcus Brinkmann schrieb:
> The decision which processes can access a tagged resource with extra
> privileges would be made by the processes doing the tagging according
> to its security policy.

How is that different from a design where every process can hand out
intransparent memory (that is, memory the process can only reclaim, not
inspect)? Wouldn't your design introduce all the harmful properties it
tries to abolish in the first place?
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFolpFvD/ijq9JWhsRAsSHAJ9bifmdJus2yLY68OE7SXF8ubzsbACfX9EK
l55rXsWQyEMhxc+TkgORHqw=
=Y/Fk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----