Re: Position paper

[Pierre THIERRY]

Scribit Tom Bachmann dies 06/01/2007 hora 19:26:
> I don't think cpu time pools are to be passed to servers. Although
> this would increase accounting, it would as well horrify the
> complexity of the server and require special kernel support, as has
> been discussed on the list (or on coyotos-dev?).

Won't Coyotos has scheduler activations, or the primitives needed to
implement them? I thought they would make such designs relatively easy
to implement? (but I confess I did not dig the issue of scheduler
activations deeply, and I barely grasp the concept...)

Curiously,
Pierre
-- 
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature