|
From: | Anton Tagunov |
Subject: | Re: Resource Management on General-Purpose Systems |
Date: | Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:19:05 +0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) |
I agree with Tanenbaum that if an active program's working set
>> does not fit in core and must be swapped, there is a problem. shap> if you believe that we will remain crippled by 32-bit address limits shap> forever, then Andy is right. But if you believe that 64-bit virtual shap> addresses are an inevitable transition (as I do), then I think Andy's shap> assertion is questionable. Hi! Thought: mmap( 1Tb file ) into 64bit address space use part X of the file tell OS that part X of file is no longer needed = application is simple (64bit of address) + still responsible for it's working set size cheers
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |