[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User sessions, system request
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: User sessions, system request |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:14:35 -0500 |
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:46 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> As you seem to agree, Alt+SysRq may be designed for the purpose, but it
> is badly designed and should not be used for it.
No, I do not agree with this. Yes, I agree it would be better if SysRq
did not require ALT. No, I do not agree that the current design is a
serious problem.
> > This is the right goal. The problem is to ensure that a "normal" program
> > cannot simulate a password box well enough to fool the user into
> > entering a password into an unauthorized program.
>
> The user needs to be educated for this: when entering a password,
> _always_ press break first.
Actually, that isn't necessary. There are ways to design a window
manager to provide visual feedback confirming that a trusted window has
focus.
shap
- User sessions, system request, Bas Wijnen, 2008/01/18
- Re: User sessions, system request, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/01/30
- Re: User sessions, system request, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2008/01/30
- Re: User sessions, system request, Bas Wijnen, 2008/01/30
- Re: User sessions, system request, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2008/01/30
- Re[2]: User sessions, system request, Valerio Bellizzomi, 2008/01/30
- Re: Re[2]: User sessions, system request, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2008/01/31
- Re: User sessions, system request, Bas Wijnen, 2008/01/30
- Re: User sessions, system request,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: User sessions, system request, Neal H. Walfield, 2008/01/31
- Re: User sessions, system request, Bas Wijnen, 2008/01/31
Re: User sessions, system request, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2008/01/30