[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken dream of mine :(
From: |
arnuld uttre |
Subject: |
Re: Broken dream of mine :( |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:43:45 +0530 |
>On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Michal Suchanek
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> It certainly could. It seems to be sitting in the right spot on
> low-level - high-level scale when you are out for a language for
> mathematical computations.
> However, if you agree that the low-level nature of C/C++ is what makes
> it suitable for writing things like kernels then OCaml is probably not
> a better fit for such tasks.
Yes, I really understand this fact and I really hate it too. 50 years
and only 2 languages for system softwares and hundreds for
applications, and hundreds of different hardware.
--
http://uttre.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/the-lost-love-of-mine/
Re: Broken dream of mine :(, arnuld uttre, 2009/09/17
- Re: Broken dream of mine :(, Bas Wijnen, 2009/09/17
- Re: Broken dream of mine :(, Michal Suchanek, 2009/09/17
- Re: Broken dream of mine :(, arnuld uttre, 2009/09/18
- Re: Broken dream of mine :(, Michal Suchanek, 2009/09/18
- Re: Broken dream of mine :(,
arnuld uttre <=
- Re: Broken dream of mine :(, Michal Suchanek, 2009/09/18
C++ (was: Broken dream of mine :( ), olafBuddenhagen, 2009/09/23
Re: C++ (was: Broken dream of mine :( ), arnuld uttre, 2009/09/23
Re: C++, Bahadir Balban, 2009/09/24
Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/09/24
Re: Broken dream of mine :(, arnuld uttre, 2009/09/17
C++ (was: Broken dream of mine :( ), olafBuddenhagen, 2009/09/23
- Re: C++, Bas Wijnen, 2009/09/23
- Re: C++, Tom Bachmann, 2009/09/23
- Re: C++, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2009/09/23