[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?
From: |
Burkhard Plaum |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3? |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:40:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) |
Hi,
Karl Berry schrieb:
[...]
Basically, the only reason not to do an immediate license upgrade is if
there are known to be significant client packages that are (as Peter
implied) GPLv2-only, as opposed to GPLv2-or-later. It doesn't sound
like there is.
Huh?
- MPlayer is GPL-v2 only and uses libcdio
- Therefore all projects, which borrowed code from MPlayer, should be
GPL-v2 too (e.g. xine). If they are GPL-v2+, they violate the
license.
Looks like a deadlock situation :(
If you blame the authors of GPL-v2 projects (for not allowing GPL-v2+)
or the FSF (for making a GPL-license incompatible with it's predecessor)
is up to you.
Therefore IMO GPL-v2+ is the only option for libcdio.
Burkhard
- [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, R. Bernstein, 2007/11/05
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/22
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?,
Burkhard Plaum <=
- [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Burkhard Plaum, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, Karl Berry, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, R. Bernstein, 2007/11/23
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] GPLv3?, R. Bernstein, 2007/11/23
- [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò, 2007/11/24
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] Re: GPLv3?, R. Bernstein, 2007/11/24