[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] [RFC] Alternative proposals: pragmatic-multiextent t
From: |
Pete Batard |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] [RFC] Alternative proposals: pragmatic-multiextent ts-multiextent |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:09:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
Hi Thomas,
On 2018.07.14 11:42, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
i have (for now) completed the branches
ts-multiextent
pragmatic-multiextent
Great!
Pete, may i ask you to test pragmatic-multiextent in your programs
and with your ISO collection ?
For varied reasons, it may be a couple of weeks before I can modify my
application to try to use the pragmatic-multiextent API. But I'll try to
do that when I get a chance.
I can however indicate that, while pragmatic-multiextent compiles fine
with MinGW-w32 on Windows, the test suite fails for testisorr.exe with
the following testisorr.log.
-- Good! Did not find Rock Ridge in D:/libcdio/test/data/copying.iso
-- Should have found Rock Ridge for D:/libcdio/test/data/copying-rr.iso
FAIL testisorr.exe (exit status: 2)
Same also appears to occur for me when testing on Linux...
I haven't tested the latest ts-multiextent. I may do that for MinGW, but
only if this is the branch that's going to be merged into mainline (a
move that, if it needs to be reminded, I would vote firmly against).
Regards,
/Pete