|
From: | Santos Das |
Subject: | Re: [libmicrohttpd] Question on Async support |
Date: | Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:39:13 +0530 |
I’m defining native as:
Hello Santos.Yes, you can use your own main loop. Please see:"The fourth threading model (used when no specific flag is given), uses no threads. Instead, the main application must (periodically) request file descriptor sets from MHD, perform a select call and then call MHD_run. MHD_run will then process HTTP requests as usual and return. MHD_run is guaranteed to not block; however, access handlers and response processing callbacks that it invokes may block. This mode is useful if a single-threaded implementation is desired and in particular if the main application already uses a select loop for its processing." More ...Enjoy MHD! ☺On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:36 PM Santos Das <address@hidden> wrote:Hi,Thank you for the quick reply. I have one more question, please help in clarifying -Can "libmicrohttpd" run as a part of the application event loop or is it mandatory for the "libmicrohttpd" to have its own event loop?thanks, santosOn Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:58 PM, Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:On 08/23/2018 06:21 PM, Santos Das wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone please confirm if libmicrohttpd supports the Async handling?
Yes, it supports asynchronous processing.
> Also, any information on the performance of libmicrohttps will be useful.
Let's just say if used properly, it will never be anywhere near the
bottleneck. We know people running 100,000 requests/s on a single system
with MHD years ago. Quite likely to do more today, but very difficult to
test: when benchmarking, you will always be benchmarking your clients,
your network or your application logic long before hitting any MHD
threshold (on sane operating systems).
--Silvio Clécio
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |