[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2020 23:12:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 |
On 11/24/20 4:50 PM, José Bollo wrote:
> What about if in some future an option to MHD_upgrade_action would
> enable to "extract" the socket? Something like:
>
> MHD_upgrade_action (urh, MHD_UPGRADE_ACTION_OWN_SOCKET);
>
> with a clear semantic on the implications that it has on half-closing.
I'm not sure it's needed. What's wrong with dup()?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, José Bollo, 2020/11/24
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, Christian Grothoff, 2020/11/24
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, José Bollo, 2020/11/24
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, Christian Grothoff, 2020/11/24
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, José Bollo, 2020/11/24
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets,
Christian Grothoff <=
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, José Bollo, 2020/11/26
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, Christian Grothoff, 2020/11/26
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, José Bollo, 2020/11/26
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, Christian Grothoff, 2020/11/26
- Re: [libmicrohttpd] upgrading and life cycle of sockets, José Bollo, 2020/11/26