[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] New GNU
From: |
arthur_torrey |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] New GNU |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2012 03:23:43 +0000 (UTC) |
I think that a labeling system is needed, for both hardware and software.
IMHO Software licenses are a good indicator, but it would be nice to have a
logo or a small set of them that can be put on project websites and other
appropriate places to say that it is Free Software, works w/ Free Software, or
whatever other attributes may be desired... (possibly including a "Works w/
Proprietary software" label for those users just starting the transition, but
not quite ready to break totally w/ the proprietary world)
Hardware I think should have a labeling program as well, and I do NOT think the
current FSF approach is viable because of it's exclusivity... Simple fact,
whether we like it or not, is that proprietary software has a bigger market
share, so it is a heck of a lot more valuable for a computer maker to stamp his
product "Works w/ Windows" than "Works w/ Free Software". Much as I prefer
Free Software, if I were a computer parts maker the choice between the two
labels is a no-brainer, and the decision would not be kind to the FSF...
Right now I have to read the fine print on the box, and maybe it will have
"Linux compatible" buried in the package somewhere...
Perhaps it would be possible to have a non-exclusive "Works w/ Gnu/Linux logo
that manufacturers can put on their boxes, next to the evil symbols that we
aren't going to displace - and possibly at least get a bit of extra interest,
and help to dispel the popular notion that it's hard to find hardware that runs
on Linux...
Probably several such logos could be developed - In rough order of
desirability - for accessories:
1. Has proprietary Linux Drivers
2. Needs no drivers, or has "binary blob" drivers in the kernel tree
3. Has Free drivers in the kernel tree
For stand alone devices -
1. Interoperates w/ free software
2. Uses at least some free software (i.e. current Android products) AND
interoperates.
3. Allows partial replacement of code w/ owner supplied software, but may have
proprietary bits.
4. "Hacker Friendly" - all code replaceable, no proprietary bits
Obviously a purist would prefer things w/ free drivers that are hacker
friendly, but not everyone is comfortable with Dr. Stallman's level of purity,
and I'd like to at least see SOMETHING that would help me when shopping, and
provide a bit of added pressure to move in the direction of freedom.
ART
------------------
Arthur Torrey
-------------------
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] New GNU, (continued)