Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

[André Silva]

On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>
>> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux', we will
>> maintain a good relationship with Arch guys, if we put 'Arch GNU/Linux',
>> we will maintain a good relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard
>> Stallman. What should we use? good question and big problem.
> 
> What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?

+1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the
Social Contract.

>> Otherwise, shouldn't all clauses in our Social Contract be revised under
>> a lawyer too? Maybe FSF or Fundatia Ceata (through Tiberiu) could help
>> us on it.
> 
> Why do you need a lawyer?

I think we need a lawyer to see if it needs more clarification and avoid
contradictions in our clauses.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature