[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GFDL license help
From: |
quiliro |
Subject: |
Re: GFDL license help |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:41:37 -0500 |
Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> * quiliro@riseup.net <quiliro@riseup.net> [2021-04-12 17:21]:
>> Ali Reza Hayati <arh@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > I don't want to use those licenses again. I'm trying to avoid any
>> > organization that signed RMS' resignation letter. I still contribute
>> > to communities' works but I won't be using or contributing to any
>> > organization that signed the RMS/FSF open lying letter.
>>
>> Me too. I will avoid promoting any project which does not openly support
>> Richard Stallman.
>
> Maybe you meant, when it openly defame RMS.
I might not be able to accomplish my intent. I am thinking that maybe
it could not be convenient either. But what I meant is that I would
promote only projects that support RMS. Some projects might have their
own policy and would not want to take sides. So, I would have to think
this policy better.
- GFDL license help, Ali Reza Hayati, 2021/04/09
- Re: GFDL license help, Aaron Wolf, 2021/04/09
- Re: GFDL license help, Pedro Lucas Porcellis, 2021/04/09
- Re: GFDL license help, Kesara Rathnayake, 2021/04/10
- Re: GFDL license help, Ali Reza Hayati, 2021/04/10
- Re: GFDL license help, quiliro, 2021/04/12
- Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12
- Re: GFDL license help,
quiliro <=
- Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/13
- Re: GFDL license help, quiliro, 2021/04/13
Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12
Blog licenses must be diverse - was Re: GFDL license help, Jean Louis, 2021/04/12