Re: test && test --> test -a

[Tim Van Holder]

> I don't understand why you want to change this, either way, -a or &&
> both are portable, both work exactly the same way (AFAICT).
> If you have some specific reason to go one way or the other, let us
> know, otherwise what's the point?

Well, consistency is always a good thing, isn't it?
I do seem to recall either the autoconf docs, or the GNU coding
standards saying many options to test are highly unportable, -a being
one of the more benign (though still not technically portable), so I
guess I'd favor the && solution (I don't think autoconf/configure
use test -a anywhere either).