[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: ltmain.in]
From: |
postmaster |
Subject: |
Re: [Fwd: ltmain.in] |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:55:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Demon-WebMail/2.0 |
address@hidden wrote:
>
> I found that freebsd is hacking all the ltmain.sh-es to get
> roughly the same behavior that netbsd is already getting.
> Any objections to putting something along these lines into
> ltmain.in? (Obviously changing /usr/bin/false to something
> conditional on not being freebsd.)
Looks good to me. Please apply the same change to all live branches though!
Cheers,
Gary.
> > --- config/ltmain.sh.orig Mon Sep 3 18:24:41 2001
> > +++ config/ltmain.sh Thu Dec 6 03:24:42 2001
> > @@ -2408,6 +2408,9 @@
> > *-*-netbsd*)
> > # Don't link with libc until the a.out ld.so is fixed.
> > ;;
> > + *-*-freebsd*)
> > + # FreeBSD doesn't need this...
> > + ;;
> > *)
> > # Add libc to deplibs on all other systems if necessary.
> > if test $build_libtool_need_lc = "yes"; then
> > @@ -4175,10 +4178,12 @@
> > fi
> >
> > # Install the pseudo-library for information purposes.
> > + if /usr/bin/false; then
> > name=`$echo "X$file" | $Xsed -e 's%^.*/%%'`
> > instname="$dir/$name"i
> > $show "$install_prog $instname $destdir/$name"
> > $run eval "$install_prog $instname $destdir/$name" || exit $?
> > + fi
> >
> > # Maybe install the static library, too.
> > test -n "$old_library" && staticlibs="$staticlibs
> > $dir/$old_library"
- Re: [Fwd: ltmain.in],
postmaster <=