Re: darwin sys_lib_search_path_spec patch

[Robert Boehne]

Maybe Apple should get a bug report on this, as it looks
to me like a problem they have introduced.

Robert

Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 01:59  AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >
> > I second this opinion.  While /usr/local may be the default install
> > prefix, it may serve as a trashcan for outdated relics on many systems
> > which do not use the default prefix.  As soon as the user specifies a
> > prefix other than /usr/local, /usr/local should be ignored unless the
> > system's tools automatically look there.
> >
> 
> Um, well, regardless of what gcc -print-search-dirs says, gcc invokes
> ld to do the linking and ld looks in /lib /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib.
> I am not talking about adding arbitrary paths for my own amusement, the
> system tools do look in /usr/local/lib, just gcc -print-search-dirs
> sucks.
> 
> Peter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool-patches mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches