Re: FYI: 50-gary-report-test-config.patch

[Charles Wilson]

Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Applied to HEAD.
>
> Chuck, if you still have indeterminacy problems after this patch (Since 
> I still can't reproduce it, I'm hoping the new autoreconf step might 
> generate a working configure for you), please send me the newly verbose 
> output of a `VERBOSE=1 make check'.  Hopefully, I'll have enough to go 
> on at that point.

[Note: the following results are from a 2003-11-12 checkout of libtool 
CVS HEAD, with 50-gary-report... applied.  I didn't want to cvs update, 
because I wanted to change as little as possible between this run and my 
last report.]

Well, it seems better.  I am now (consistently) failing
  demo-hardcode.test
which is a new behavior.  But setting that aside, here's the (condensed) 
output from the initial verbose run:

PASS: assign
PASS: link
PASS: link-2
PASS: nomode
FAIL: quote
PASS: sh
PASS: suffix
PASS: cdemo-static
PASS: cdemo-make
PASS: cdemo-exec
PASS: demo-static
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: demo-inst
PASS: demo-unst
PASS: depdemo-static
PASS: depdemo-make
PASS: depdemo-exec
PASS: depdemo-inst
PASS: depdemo-unst
PASS: mdemo-static
PASS: mdemo-make
FAIL: mdemo-exec
PASS: mdemo-inst
PASS: mdemo-unst
PASS: cdemo-conf
PASS: cdemo-make
PASS: cdemo-exec
PASS: demo-conf
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: demo-inst
PASS: demo-unst
PASS: demo-deplibs
PASS: depdemo-conf
PASS: depdemo-make
PASS: depdemo-exec
PASS: depdemo-inst
PASS: depdemo-unst
PASS: mdemo-conf
PASS: mdemo-make
PASS: mdemo-exec
PASS: mdemo-inst
PASS: mdemo-unst
PASS: mdemo-dryrun
PASS: mdemo2-conf
PASS: mdemo2-make
PASS: mdemo2-exec
PASS: pdemo-conf
PASS: pdemo-make
PASS: pdemo-exec
PASS: pdemo-inst
PASS: demo-nofast
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: demo-inst
PASS: demo-unst
PASS: depdemo-nofast
PASS: depdemo-make
PASS: depdemo-exec
PASS: depdemo-inst
PASS: depdemo-unst
PASS: demo-pic
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: demo-nopic
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: cdemo-shared
PASS: cdemo-make
PASS: cdemo-exec
PASS: demo-shared
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: demo-inst
FAIL: demo-hardcode
PASS: demo-relink
PASS: demo-noinst-link
PASS: demo-unst
PASS: depdemo-shared
PASS: depdemo-make
PASS: depdemo-exec
PASS: depdemo-inst
FAIL: depdemo-relink
PASS: depdemo-unst
PASS: mdemo-shared
PASS: mdemo-make
FAIL: mdemo-exec
PASS: mdemo-inst
PASS: mdemo-unst
PASS: tagdemo-static
PASS: tagdemo-make
PASS: tagdemo-exec
PASS: tagdemo-conf
PASS: tagdemo-make
PASS: tagdemo-exec
PASS: tagdemo-shared
PASS: tagdemo-make
PASS: tagdemo-exec
FAIL: f77demo-static
SKIP: f77demo-make
SKIP: f77demo-exec
PASS: f77demo-conf
PASS: f77demo-make
PASS: f77demo-exec
PASS: f77demo-shared
PASS: f77demo-make
PASS: f77demo-exec

The second time, I reran the mdemo-static group, the demo-shared group, 
the mdemo-shared group, and the f77demo-static group.  This time, the 
f77demo-static and mdemo-shared groups succeeded:

FAIL: mdemo-static
PASS: mdemo-make
FAIL: mdemo-exec
PASS: mdemo-inst
PASS: mdemo-unst
PASS: demo-shared
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: demo-inst
FAIL: demo-hardcode
PASS: demo-relink
PASS: demo-noinst-link
PASS: demo-unst
PASS: mdemo-shared
PASS: mdemo-make
PASS: mdemo-exec
PASS: mdemo-inst
PASS: mdemo-unst
PASS: f77demo-static
PASS: f77demo-make
PASS: f77demo-exec

So, I reran the mdemo-static and demo-shared groups a third time. 
Again, demo-shared failed -- so this seems to be a consistent, but new, 
failure.   mdemo-static behaves slightly differently each of the three 
times, so it's still flaky.  And f77-static was different the first and 
second times.  But everything else now seems consistent, so this is a 
big improvement.

PASS: mdemo-static
PASS: mdemo-make
FAIL: mdemo-exec
PASS: mdemo-inst
PASS: mdemo-unst
PASS: demo-shared
PASS: demo-make
PASS: demo-exec
PASS: demo-inst
FAIL: demo-hardcode
PASS: demo-relink
PASS: demo-noinst-link
PASS: demo-unst

The full verbose output of all three runs is attached.

--
Chuck

cygwin-test-results.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data