[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:57:05 +0000 |
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 21:27, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 3, 2004, at 07:01 pm, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > After applying this patch aclocal fails with:
> >
> > NONE:0: /usr/bin/m4: ERROR: EOF in string
> >
> > Which makes it a bit hard to play with :(
>
> D'oh! Two of the AU_DEFUNs have mismatched brackets.
>
Hey, at least you actually attached the patch and it was valid :-)
> > LT_INIT_LIBTOOL([1.6 C C++ disable-shared no-pic])
> >
> For the sake of making traces easier I definitely want to separate out
> the tags. I don't think we should support mix-in tags and options, it
> will make the implementation messier. The one way should be two args:
> first list options, then list tags.
>
So a canonical form of:
LT_PREREQ([1.6])
LT_INIT_LIBTOOL([C C++], [disable-shared no-pic])
I've deliberately made the tags the first argument there, as I think
people are more likely to specify tags than options.
Or perhaps split it out a little further:
LT_PREREQ([1.6])
LT_LANG_SUPPORT([C C++])
LT_INIT_LIBTOOL([disable-shared no-pic])
Automake couldn't directly steal LT_LANG_SUPPORT or the first argument
though. I'm quite determined that we should allow real language names
rather than just tags for it, just as Autoconf itself does.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch, (continued)
Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/02/02
Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/02/02
Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/02/02
Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch, Scott James Remnant, 2004/02/03
Re: RFC: 77-gary-diagnose-version-mismatch.patch, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/02/03