Re: [FYI] loader-dyld.c did not compile

[Gary V . Vaughan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 19 Apr 2004, at 14:48, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> > Yep, IIRC.
> > This got me to thinking that we should offer both under Panther (in 
> > the same way you get
> > both LoadLibrary and dlopen under cygwin)... what do you think?
>
> It would certainly make it easier to keep the dyld loader in a 
> compilable state :)
>
> If you want to make it use both, that is fine with me, but I'd rather 
> that ltdl prefer dlopen if it is available.

Okay, I'll look into it presently.

>  Reason being that the dlopen in panther is better tested than the 
> dyld code in ltdl (although there are some striking similarities 
> between the two, `man 3 dlopen' on your panther box if you are curious 
> as to why).

Heh :-)  Cool!  Congratulations.

$ man 3 dlopen | grep Peter
   If you find any more, please contact Peter O'Gorman 
<address@hidden>

Cheers,
        Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFAg+hTFRMICSmD1gYRAnuJAJ9BCVKn/ReUE6t1nuGzFeOhD12xRwCbB0Xe
FAWgmMJ4cU/7Iao7YtLYiSk=
=rrbZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----