libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14


From: Richard Dawe
Subject: Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:00:22 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031031

Hello.

Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
On 23 Apr 2004, at 17:10, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
[snip]
So, 8+3 limitations may re-appear in some areas which use GNU build
tools.


These would only be target hosts for a cross build though right? No one
is actually going to host a full development environment on such machines
these days, surely?

As suprising at it may seem, yes, people still do.

Recently someone asked in comp.os.msdos.djgpp what platforms people were using. I was surprised that the majority of people that replied were using processors <= 400 MHz and various DOSes.

I guess if it's possible to update libtool in a way that doesn't preclude running on 8+3 systems, then you should. But I know it's a right PITA.

Most of the problems I found when porting libtool 1.4.3 and 1.5 to DJGPP were the filenames being too long. That problem is easier to solve. Harder problems to solve are more than one period in a filename and filenames beginning with a period. If you can avoid those, then porting to DJGPP should be reasonably simple, in general.

Incidentally, DJGPP development is pretty much dead these days. No-one has stepped up to maintain any of the packages I used to maintain.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

--
Richard Dawe [ http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~phekda/richdawe/ ]

"You can't evaluate a man by logic alone."
  -- McCoy, "I, Mudd", Star Trek





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]