[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2004 08:31:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:09:19PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 06:04:44PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote:
> > The following patch will pass all -[arg] and +[arg] switches through.
> > Is it safe?
>
> On a mostly philosophical point, I think that allowing arguments that
> libtool doesn't recognize through to the compiler removes some of the
> advantages that libtool brings to a project: it is the thin end of the
> wedge to starting to put non-portable flags into Makefile.am.
>
> Besides, you can already do this, but at the moment you have to do it
> consciously and say `-Xcompiler -peculiar-flag-for-my-compiler', which
> at least forces the user to acknowledge that they are going behind
> libtool's back, so it will be hardly surprising to them if libtool gets
> confused later on...
This doesn't help during ./configure. This is the crux of the problem.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Ludovic Courtès, 2004/09/02
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/03
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Albert Chin, 2004/09/03
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/03
- Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/05
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/09/05
Re: Additional link flags for HP aCC and SGI CC, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/09/03