[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MinGW & library_names
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: MinGW & library_names |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:01:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 04:17:36PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >If *.dll.a is still needed in library_names in the .la file, I guess
> >there is no choice. Seems icky though.
> >
>
> It's because library_names is used for multiple purposes by the libtool
> machinery and by libltdl. One is the names that can be linked against
> (.a, .dll.a, and .dll), while the other is the names that can be
> dlopen/LoadLibrary'ed (.a, .dll).
>
> On (all?) other platforms, those two sets are identical; on
> cygwin/windows, they are not.
Then how about we add dlopen_library_names to .la files on systems
where it is needed?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- MinGW & library_names, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/29
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Albert Chin, 2004/09/29
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Charles Wilson, 2004/09/29
- Re: MinGW & library_names,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/29
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/09/30
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/30
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/09/30
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/09/30
- Re: MinGW & library_names, Howard Chu, 2004/09/29
Re: MinGW & library_names, Charles Wilson, 2004/09/29