Re: FYI: libtool--devo--1.0--patch-214

[Peter O'Gorman]

Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Applied to HEAD.
>
> This is just a bit of a hack really, but I want to make sure that
> I get to release an alpha this weekend, even if I don't have time
> to rewrite the hardcode tests in libtool.m4 by then.

This is bogus. Please revert and check what is wrong locally on your system.

Did a clean checkout and bootstrap, a VPATH build and make check.

demo-hardcode.test: ===  Running demo-hardcode.test
demo-hardcode.test: ===  Running `make hardcode' in demo
You may ignore any linking errors from the following command:
gcc -g -O2  -o hc-direct main.o ./.libs/libhello.dylib    || echo 
unsupported > hc-direct
echo unsupported > hc-libflag
You may ignore any linking errors from the following command:
DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=./.libs gcc -g -O2  -o hc-libpath main.o -lhello    || 
echo unsupported > hc-libpath
ld: can't locate file for: -lhello
gcc -g -O2  -o hc-minusL main.o -L./.libs -lhello    || echo unsupported > 
hc-minusL
demo-hardcode.test: ===  Finding libtool.m4's guesses at hardcoding values
= Searching for hardcoded library directories in each program
.libs was not hardcoded in `hc-direct', as libtool expected
`hc-libflag' was not linked properly, as libtool expected
`hc-libpath' was not linked properly, which fooled libtool
.libs was not hardcoded in `hc-minusL', as libtool expected
FAIL: demo-hardcode.test

Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com