[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MinGW issue
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: MinGW issue |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Oct 2004 21:07:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 09:59:56PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >>$run eval "${ECHO} EXPORTS "'> "$output_objdir/$output.def"'
> >>$run eval "${SED} -n -e 'p'"' < "$export_symbols" >>
> >>"$output_objdir/$output.def"'
> >>
> >>That should work, right, if the -n option to sed is universal? (there's
> >>one other place where you have to do the same thing).
> >
> >
> >The original code just inserts "EXPORTS" at the first line. So, why
> >not just:
> > $run ${ECHO} EXPORTS > "$output_objdir/$output.def"
> > $run cat "$export_symbols" >> "$output_objdir/$output.def"
> >
>
> Because I wasn't sure if we were allowed to use cat (just bare 'cat',
> not even ${CAT}). I *know* we can use ${ECHO} and ${SED}.
ltmain already uses bare 'cat'.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- MinGW issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Brad, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Albert Chin, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Charles Wilson, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Albert Chin, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Charles Wilson, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: MinGW issue, Charles Wilson, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Albert Chin, 2004/10/09
- Re: MinGW issue, Charles Wilson, 2004/10/10
- Re: MinGW issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/10/11
- Re: MinGW issue, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/10/09