Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results

[Peter O'Gorman]

Albert Chin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:15:39PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > So now, with the patch below, plus LDFLAGS=-nofor_main, all Fortran
> > tests pass.  Is it sensible to require the user to set the LDFLAGS
> > setting?
>
>
> I don't think so. Is there every a time when libtool-created Fortran
> libraries should not use -nofor_main? If not, then m4/libtool.m4
> should be updated to use -nofor_main (in which case the patch to
> config/ltmain.m4sh should be unnecessary).
>
> Libtool should do the "right thing" by default.

Looks to me like when building shared libraries with ifort the -nofor_main 
flag is required. This could be the first fortran specific archive_cmds in 
libtool.m4 :-/

Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com