[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Second attempt at patch to libtool 1.5.10
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Second attempt at patch to libtool 1.5.10 |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:31:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
Hi Craig,
* Craig Dooley wrote on Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 03:42:12PM CET:
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:25:26 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > * Craig Dooley wrote on Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 03:15:24PM CET:
> > > Here is a second attempt at a patch to add dragonfly support for
> > > libtool 1.5.10. This was tested on dragonfly1.1-CURRENT with gcc
> > > 3.4.1. With this patch installed, all the test suites pass, except
> > > one saying shlibpath_overrides_runpath should be set to yes. As
> > > dragonfly was a fork from FreeBSD 4.8, I chose to leave
> > > shlibpath_overrides_runpath as no, to match the FreeBSD behavior.
*snip*
> I will try this patch against libtool from CVS
> this morning and tell you how the test suite goes.
This is a gentle ping to enquire whether we should still wait for test
results on your side or just go ahead and apply the patch.
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: Second attempt at patch to libtool 1.5.10,
Ralf Wildenhues <=