Re: [PATCH-1.5] darwin -framework

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:26:38PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 04:26:22PM CET:
> >
> >>This is something people bug me about often. It is not the same as 
> >>HEAD/branch-2.0 but would satisfy most darwin users. Okay to commit?
> >>
> >>    * ltmain.in [darwin]: Allow -framework foo through when given on
> >>    the command line.
> >
> >Does it break an eventual upgrade path from 1.5 to 2.0?
> >I think not, but I'm not sure (1.5 then allows to add `-framework
> >stuff', 2.0 also puts it in .la file and reuses it from there?).
> 
> No, 2.0 will put stuff in the .la and won't die if it sees -framework in 
> dependency_libs, both will accept -framework on the link line.

Yeah, that's what I meant: Even with your change there is a clear
upgrade path from 1.5 to 2.0.

> >Could you point me to some docs about what -framework does
> >(lacking proper terms to do a web search with)?
> >
> 
> A framework is a container for libraries and headers. E.g. Mac OS X has a 
*snip valuable info*

Thanks.  Please go ahead and apply.

Regards,
Ralf