[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: release policy
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: release policy |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:52:47 -0500 (CDT) |
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
Ooh! Ouch! :-)
I mean to soy that it is easier to resist the temptation to push another
patch into the tree when a future release date is looming. Having a 'can
Does this mean that you are willing to back off on your latest large
patch?
Large patches tend to oppose actual stability and getting a release
out the door. The last I heard, the plan was to get libtool 2.0 out
the door.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, (continued)
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Charles Wilson, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/17
- Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy [was more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD], Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: release policy, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Peter O'Gorman, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/09/18
- Re: release policy, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/09/18