[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 15:34:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) |
Hi Albert,
Albert Chin wrote:
Updated patch for new hardcode_direct_static variable:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2006-05/msg00018.html
Patch against HEAD.
2006-05-16 Albert Chin-A-Young <address@hidden>
* tests/link-order.at: Take hardcode_direct and
hardcode_direct_static into consideration when testing
link order.
Thanks. Applied both this change and the linked patch.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://blog.azazil.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://trac.azazil.net/projects/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Albert Chin, 2006/05/17
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/17
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/05/17
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/17
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/05/17
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/05/17
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/17
- Re: HEAD link-order.at fails when hardcode_direct=yes, Albert Chin, 2006/05/17