[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements |
Date: |
Wed, 17 May 2006 22:11:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:48:14PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >>> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LINKER_OPTION): Require
> >>> _LT_DECL_SED.
> >>> (_LT_CMD_GLOBAL_SYMBOLS, _LT_LINKER_SHLIBS): Likewise.
> >>> * libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4 (LTDL_INIT): Likewise.
> >>> Report by Eric Blake.
> > (_LT_DECL_SED): Set $Xsed here, using $SED. Moved from...
> > (_LT_SETUP): ...here.
>
> All the more evidence for a nice automated check! :-)
I don't think so. Let's make it less unnecessary automation for once.
Less factorization, less requirements stuff; after all, there is IMHO no
need to factorize unless the stuff is actually supposed to possibly used
in different combinations. But I've ranted about AC_REQUIRE/m4_require
and Libtool macros before, enough of that now...
> Looks good. Please go ahead.
Thanks! Applied.
Cheers,
Ralf
- some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/17
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/05/17
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/17
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/05/17
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/05/17
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/17
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Gary V. Vaughan, 2006/05/17
- Re: some missing _LT_DECL_SED requirements, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/18