Hello world,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 08:08:12PM CEST:
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 10:47 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:36:13PM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Does gcc have lt~obsolete.m4 anywhere? Its function is to ensure that
aclocal does not use the installed libtool.m4.
I didn't see lt~obsolete.m4, ltobsolete.m4 nor ltobsolete.m4 in gcc.
Maybe we should just force everybody to have lt~obsolete.m4. To me,
that seems to be the simplest way to avoid any hassles here. There have
been at least three different scenarios where users were confused about
whether they need it or not.
OK to install?